As we know, Legionella pneumophila thrives in warm, stagnant building plumbing and biofilms. These are exactly the conditions that can develop in domestic hot-water systems. Managing the risk takes layered defenses: temperature control, flushing, system design, and sometimes a supplemental chemical disinfectant. Monochloramine is increasingly used as the most practical, effective supplemental option for prevention and remediation of Legionella; here’s why.
Better persistence in hot, complex plumbing
Monochloramine is more stable than free chlorine and chlorine dioxide as water travels through mains and complex building plumbing systems. That stability produces a long lasting residual in distal taps and hot-water branches, helping maintain disinfectant where others dissipate. Longer and higher (but acceptable) residuals mean better suppression of Legionella growth between active maintenance events.
Improved biofilm penetration
Legionella thrives, survives, and regrows inside protective biofilms. Studies and field reports show monochloramine penetrates and acts within biofilms more effectively than chlorine, reducing reservoirs that regularly seed pipe interiors and fixtures. That makes it especially useful as part of remediation programs in buildings already colonized by Legionella. Demonstrated field effectivenessMultiple peer-reviewed and agency reviews document reductions in Legionella colonization after switching to or adding monochloramine disinfection in water systems. While no single measure should be considered a “silver bullet”, monochloramine has a consistent record as an extremely effective control technology in premise plumbing.
Lower formation of some regulated disinfection byproducts
Compared with free chlorine, monochloramine tends to form different, and often lower levels of certain regulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids in distribution systems. That DBP profile is one reason many utilities use chloramines their primary disinfectant. Still, DBP trade-offs require evaluation for each facility. Environmental Protection Agency. Some concerns about nitrogen based byproduct formation have been discussed in white papers in the past, but with proper generation equipment and technology (Sanipur) and field test kits, facilities can keep nitrite, nitrate, and ammonia levels below the maximum contaminant level. The chart below can be used to compare disinfectants:
Fits within required risk-management frameworks
Standards and guidance (ASHRAE Standard 188 / Guideline 12, CDC toolkits, and technical reviews) recommend integrating supplemental disinfection into a comprehensive water-management program. Agencies note that specific supplemental control limits and shock procedures should be determined by water-treatment experts and the building’s water-management program. In short: like most disinfectants, monochloramine can be powerful, but it must be implemented and monitored properly.
Above: An installation of a monochloramine system at a customer site.
Takeaway
Monochloramine offers stability, biofilm efficacy, and documented field success that make it an attractive supplemental disinfectant for domestic hot water when Legionella prevention or remediation is required. Because implementation affects system chemistry, plumbing materials, and compliance with local drinking-water rules, always work with your water utility and a qualified water-treatment professional to design, dose, monitor, and validate any monochloramine program in a building. For practical guidance, consult ASHRAE standards/guidelines, the CDC potable-water toolkits, and EPA resources on chloramines and Legionella control.
Visit our Knowledge Center to learn more about
Sanipur Monochloramine generators, or request a site survey and one of our technical engineers will be in touch.
Kyle Pachowitz
Director of Water Safety, Watertech of America, Inc.
Kyle is director of water safety at Watertech of America, Inc. He has ten years of direct water treatment industry experience in the prevention and remediation of Legionella and other waterborne pathogens. Has experience implementing and consulting on AAMI TIR34 standard, VHA Directive 1061, and ASHRAE 188-2015. Kyle Pachowitz also has a bachelor’s degree in biochemistry from UW-Milwaukee and an ASSE 12080 certification.
References: